| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Owner / Applicant Information |
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen |
|
Jehl |
|
|
|
|
|
Washington Square Indiana LLC |
|
|
6426 GEORGETOWN LANE |
|
|
|
|
|
FORT WAYNE |
|
IN |
|
46815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phone |
|
2607490461 |
|
|
|
|
|
Email |
|
[email protected] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Project Information |
|
|
|
|
Washington Square fire hydrant |
|
|
|
|
6101 North Clinton St |
|
|
|
|
|
Fort Wayne |
|
|
|
46825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
County |
|
ALLEN |
|
|
|
|
|
Project Type |
|
New |
|
|
|
Addition |
|
|
|
Alteration |
|
|
|
Existing |
|
Y |
|
Change of Occupancy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Project Status |
|
U |
|
F=Filed U or Null=Unfiled |
|
|
|
|
|
|
IDHS Issued Correction order? |
|
No |
|
yes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Violation Issued by: |
|
LFD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Local Building Official |
|
|
|
|
Phone: |
|
2604497131 |
|
Email: |
|
[email protected] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Local Fire Official |
|
|
Phone: |
|
2604497131 |
|
Email: |
|
Brian.Armstrong @cityoffortwayne.org |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance Details |
|
|
|
|
Code Name: |
|
2014 IFC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
507.5.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Conditions: |
|
Hydrant is question is not working. We seek to place a private fire hydrant out of service as there is currently a city hydrant 200 feet away on Bethany Lane and a private hydrant 200 feet to the south that would serve the purpose if extinguishing needs arise.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEMONSTRATION THAT PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELFARE ARE PROTECTED: |
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
DEMONSTRATION THAT PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELFARE ARE PROTECTED: |
|
|
|
|
|
1=Non-compliance with the rule will not be adverse to the public health, safety or w |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2= Applicant will undertake alternative actions in lieu of compliance with the rule to ensure that granting of the variance will not be adverse to public health, safety, or welfare. Explain why alternative actions would be adequate (be specific).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facts: |
|
2 hydrants close by 200 ft north and 200 ft south. |
|
|
|
|
|
DEMONSTRATION OF UNDUE HARDSHIP OR HISTORICALLY SIGNIFICANT STRUCTURE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Imposition of the rule would result in an undue hardship (unusual difficulty) because of physical limitations of the construction site or its utility services.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Imposition of the rule would result in an undue hardship (unusual difficulty) because of major operational problems in the use of the building or structure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y |
|
Imposition of the rule would result in an undue hardship (unusual difficulty) because of excessive costs of additional or altered construction elements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Imposition of the rule would prevent the preservation of an architecturally or a historically significant part of the building or structure
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facts: |
|
cost to replace would be $9179 plus extra for repairs of area around hydrant. |
|
|
|