Owner / Applicant Information | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Janeen | Sprague | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
J Enterprises of Nashville, IN | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
430 2ND ST | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
COLUMBUS | IN | 47201 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phone | 8123792173 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[email protected] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitter Information | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Melissa | Tupper | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RTM Consultants, Inc. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6640 Parkdale Place | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Indianapolis | IN | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phone | 3173297700 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[email protected] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Designer Information | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Robert | Bray | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
American Structurepoint, Inc. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7260 Shadeland Station | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Indianapolis | IN | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phone | 3175475580 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[email protected] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Project Information | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hampton Inn and Suites | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
361 Paris Dr | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
FRANKLIN | IN | 46131 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
County | JOHNSON | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Project Type | New | Y | Addition | Alteration | Existing | Change of Occupancy | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Project Status | F | F=Filed U or Null=Unfiled | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
IDHS Issued Correction order? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Violation Issued by: | NA | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Local Building Official | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phone: | 3177363631 | Email: | [email protected] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Local Fire Official | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3177363631 | Email: | [email protected] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phone: |
Variance Details | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Code Name: | Other Code (Not in the list provided) | |||||||||||||||||||||
2014 IBC, 716.5.9.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Conditions: | Two restroom doors will not be provided with latches. Based upon the 20-minute rating, the corridor doors are required to latch.
The project involves a new 4-story hotel. The building is Type IIB construction and sprinklered per NFPA 13R. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
DEMONSTRATION THAT PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELFARE ARE PROTECTED: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
1=Non-compliance with the rule will not be adverse to the public health, safety or w | ||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2= Applicant will undertake alternative actions in lieu of compliance with the rule to ensure that granting of the variance will not be adverse to public health, safety, or welfare. Explain why alternative actions would be adequate (be specific). |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Facts: | 1. The building will be protected throughout with an automatic sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13R.
2. The building will have a fire alarm system with smoke detection in the corridors. 3. Closers will be provided on the restroom doors. 4. There is virtually no combustible fire load in the toilet rooms. Based upon this, the building being sprinklered, and closers being provided the lack of latching hardware is not adverse to public health, safety, or welfare. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
DEMONSTRATION OF UNDUE HARDSHIP OR HISTORICALLY SIGNIFICANT STRUCTURE: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Imposition of the rule would result in an undue hardship (unusual difficulty) because of physical limitations of the construction site or its utility services. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Y | Imposition of the rule would result in an undue hardship (unusual difficulty) because of major operational problems in the use of the building or structure. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Imposition of the rule would result in an undue hardship (unusual difficulty) because of excessive costs of additional or altered construction elements. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Imposition of the rule would prevent the preservation of an architecturally or a historically significant part of the building or structure |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Facts: | It is an operational hardship for the hotel. Hampton brand standards do not permit having a latching lockset on the restroom doors. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Variance Details | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Code Name: | Other Code (Not in the list provided) | |||||||||||||||||||||
2014 IBC, 716.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Conditions: | Nonrated door and window openings will occur in corridor wall for the fitness room on the 1st floor. Based upon the 0.5-hour corridor rating, openings are required to have a fireprotection rating.
The project involves a new 4-story hotel. The building is Type IIB construction and sprinklered per NFPA 13R. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
DEMONSTRATION THAT PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELFARE ARE PROTECTED: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
1=Non-compliance with the rule will not be adverse to the public health, safety or w | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2= Applicant will undertake alternative actions in lieu of compliance with the rule to ensure that granting of the variance will not be adverse to public health, safety, or welfare. Explain why alternative actions would be adequate (be specific). |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Facts: | 1. The building will be protected throughout with an automatic sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13R.
2. The openings will be protected with a sprinkler located at the ceiling level spaced every 6 feet and within 12" of the opening on the room side. 3. A fire alarm system will be installed throughout the building. 4. Similar variances have been granted in the past, most recently Haywood Apartments 19-05- 62(a). |
|||||||||||||||||||||
DEMONSTRATION OF UNDUE HARDSHIP OR HISTORICALLY SIGNIFICANT STRUCTURE: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Imposition of the rule would result in an undue hardship (unusual difficulty) because of physical limitations of the construction site or its utility services. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Imposition of the rule would result in an undue hardship (unusual difficulty) because of major operational problems in the use of the building or structure. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Y | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Imposition of the rule would result in an undue hardship (unusual difficulty) because of excessive costs of additional or altered construction elements. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Imposition of the rule would prevent the preservation of an architecturally or a historically significant part of the building or structure |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Facts: | The owner wishes to have windows and glass door to make the fitness room feel more open and inviting. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Variance Details | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Code Name: | Other Code (Not in the list provided) | |||||||||||||||||||||
2014 IBC, 1018.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Conditions: | The breakfast area and pantry will be open to the 1st floor fire-rated egress corridor. The code requires corridors to be 1-hour fire-resistive construction and does not permit them to be interrupted by intervening rooms except for foyers, lobbies, and reception rooms.
The project involves a new 4-story hotel. The building is Type IIB construction and sprinklered per NFPA 13R. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
DEMONSTRATION THAT PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELFARE ARE PROTECTED: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
1=Non-compliance with the rule will not be adverse to the public health, safety or w | ||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2= Applicant will undertake alternative actions in lieu of compliance with the rule to ensure that granting of the variance will not be adverse to public health, safety, or welfare. Explain why alternative actions would be adequate (be specific). |
||||||||||||||||||||||
2= Applicant will undertake alternative actions in lieu of compliance with the rule to ensure that granting of the variance will not be adverse to public health, safety, or welfare. Explain why alternative actions would be adequate (be specific). |
||||||||||||||
Facts: | 1. The building will be protected throughout with a sprinkler system per NFPA 13R.
2. The design of the corridor will comply with Sec. 28.3.6..3.2, NFPA 101, Life Safety Code, which permits spaces to be open to the corridor in a hotel occupancy, provided that the spaces are not used for sleeping rooms, the building is protected throughout with a sprinkler system, and the space does not obstruct access to required exits. 3. This request is nearly identical to previously approved variances for other hotels and other R-1 Occupancies including 18-11-53, 18-07-29, 18-05-16, 18-02-10, 17-12-33(a), 16-11-46, 15-09-09 and 14-11-21(a). |
|||||||||||||
DEMONSTRATION OF UNDUE HARDSHIP OR HISTORICALLY SIGNIFICANT STRUCTURE: | ||||||||||||||
Imposition of the rule would result in an undue hardship (unusual difficulty) because of physical limitations of the construction site or its utility services. |
||||||||||||||
Imposition of the rule would result in an undue hardship (unusual difficulty) because of major operational problems in the use of the building or structure. |
||||||||||||||
Y | ||||||||||||||
Imposition of the rule would result in an undue hardship (unusual difficulty) because of excessive costs of additional or altered construction elements. |
||||||||||||||
Imposition of the rule would prevent the preservation of an architecturally or a historically significant part of the building or structure |
||||||||||||||
Facts: | Open spaces to a 1st floor corridor are typical for hotels. Imposition of the rule would require walls to separate the breakfast room from the corridor. |
|||||||||||||