| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Owner / Applicant Information |
|
|
|
|
|
David |
|
Gettinger / MSD of Perry Township |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6548 ORINOCO AVE. |
|
|
|
|
|
INDIANAPOLIS |
|
IN |
|
46227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phone |
|
3177896213 |
|
|
|
|
|
Email |
|
[email protected] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Project Information |
|
|
|
|
Southport High School |
|
|
|
|
971 E. Banta |
|
|
|
|
|
Indianapolis |
|
|
|
46227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
County |
|
MARION |
|
|
|
|
|
Project Type |
|
New |
|
|
|
Addition |
|
|
|
Alteration |
|
Y |
|
Existing |
|
|
|
Change of Occupancy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Project Status |
|
F |
|
F=Filed U or Null=Unfiled |
|
|
|
|
|
|
IDHS Issued Correction order? |
|
No |
|
No |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Violation Issued by: |
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Local Building Official |
|
|
|
|
Phone: |
|
3173393397 |
|
Email: |
|
[email protected] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Local Fire Official |
|
|
Phone: |
|
3173393397 |
|
Email: |
|
[email protected] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance Details |
|
|
|
|
Code Name: |
|
2014 Indiana Building Code |
|
|
|
|
|
|
903.3.1.1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Conditions: |
|
All areas are to be covered by sprinkler |
|
|
|
|
DEMONSTRATION THAT PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELFARE ARE PROTECTED: |
|
|
|
|
|
1=Non-compliance with the rule will not be adverse to the public health, safety or w |
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
1=Non-compliance with the rule will not be adverse to the public health, safety or w |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2= Applicant will undertake alternative actions in lieu of compliance with the rule to ensure that granting of the variance will not be adverse to public health, safety, or welfare. Explain why alternative actions would be adequate (be specific).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facts: |
|
High voltage electrical room already covered by smoke detectors should be exempt from sprinkler for safety reasons
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEMONSTRATION OF UNDUE HARDSHIP OR HISTORICALLY SIGNIFICANT STRUCTURE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Imposition of the rule would result in an undue hardship (unusual difficulty) because of physical limitations of the construction site or its utility services.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Imposition of the rule would result in an undue hardship (unusual difficulty) because of major operational problems in the use of the building or structure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y |
|
Imposition of the rule would result in an undue hardship (unusual difficulty) because of excessive costs of additional or altered construction elements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Imposition of the rule would prevent the preservation of an architecturally or a historically significant part of the building or structure
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facts: |
|
I can have it sprinkled seemed dangerous for Fire dept. with high voltage and water.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|