Owner / Applicant Information

JOSH

HREHA

805 W. CITY CENTER DR.

CARMEL

46032

Phone

3172181642

[email protected]

Submitter Information

Tera

King

6630 Frito Lay Dr.

Evansville

Phone

8124759169

[email protected]

Designer Information

Craig

Penquite

DKGR

10 West Market Street, Suite 8

Indianapolis

Phone

3176140053

[email protected]

Project Information

The Post House

123 NW 3RD St.

Evansville

47708

County

VANDERBURGH

Project Type

New

Addition

Alteration

Existing

Change of Occupancy

Project Status

F=Filed U or Null=Unfiled

IDHS Issued Correction order?

Violation Issued by:

Local Building Official

Phone:

8124367884

Email:

[email protected]

Local Fire Official

8124367884

Email:

[email protected]

Phone:

Variance Details

Code Name:

ASME A17.1 2007

2.14.1.7.1,2.20.2.1

Conditions:

THYSSENKRUPP Elevator is requesting approval for an alternate method suspension of the Evolution MRL(EVO)series of elevator to the ASME A17.12007 code year. Evolution 200 is code compliant to the ASME A17.1 2010-16 Safety Code for Elevators and Escalators and the ASME A17.6 2010 standard elevator suspension, compensation and governor system code years. The EVO product is a belted traction system with the controller either in the jamb or in a control space, control room, machine room. Please see attached application for variance as well as other supporting documentation. **Please reference approved variance 19-01-48.**

DEMONSTRATION THAT PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELFARE ARE PROTECTED:

1=Non-compliance with the rule will not be adverse to the public health, safety or w

2= Applicant will undertake alternative actions in lieu of compliance with the rule to ensure that granting of the variance will not be adverse to public health, safety, or welfare. Explain why alternative actions would be adequate (be specific).

Facts:

DEMONSTRATION OF UNDUE HARDSHIP OR HISTORICALLY SIGNIFICANT STRUCTURE:

Imposition of the rule would result in an undue hardship (unusual difficulty) because of physical limitations of the construction site or its utility services.

Imposition of the rule would result in an undue hardship (unusual difficulty) because of major operational problems in the use of the building or structure.

Imposition of the rule would result in an undue hardship (unusual difficulty) because of excessive costs of additional or altered construction elements.

Imposition of the rule would prevent the preservation of an architecturally or a historically significant part of the building or structure

Facts:

Variance Details

Code Name:

ASME A17.1 2007

2.20.3,2.20.9,2.25.3,2.20.1

Conditions:

ASME A17.1 2007 THYSSENKRUPP Elevator is requesting approval for an alternate method suspension of the Evolution MRL(EVO)series of elevator to the ASME A17.12007 code year. Evolution 200 is code compliant to the ASME A17.1 2010-16 Safety Code for Elevators and Escalators and the ASME A17.6 2010 standard elevator suspension, compensation and governor system code years. The EVO product is a belted traction system with the controller either in the jamb or in a control space, control room, machine room. Please see attached application for variance as well as other supporting documentation. **Please reference approved variance 19-01-48.**

DEMONSTRATION THAT PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELFARE ARE PROTECTED:

1=Non-compliance with the rule will not be adverse to the public health, safety or w

Facts:

DEMONSTRATION OF UNDUE HARDSHIP OR HISTORICALLY SIGNIFICANT STRUCTURE:

Imposition of the rule would result in an undue hardship (unusual difficulty) because of physical limitations of the construction site or its utility services.

Imposition of the rule would result in an undue hardship (unusual difficulty) because of major operational problems in the use of the building or structure.

Imposition of the rule would result in an undue hardship (unusual difficulty) because of excessive costs of additional or altered construction elements.

Imposition of the rule would prevent the preservation of an architecturally or a historically significant part of the building or structure

Facts:

Variance Details

Code Name:

ASME A17.1 2007

ASME A17.1 2007 2.20.2.2

Conditions:

THYSSENKRUPP Elevator is requesting approval for an alternate method suspension of the Evolution MRL(EVO)series of elevator to the ASME A17.1 2007 code year. Evolution 200 is code compliant to the ASME A17.1 2010-16 Safety Code for Elevators and Escalators and the ASME A17.6 2010 standard elevator suspension, compensation and governor system code years. The EVO product is a belted traction system with the controller either in the jamb or in a control space, control room, machine room. Please see attached application for variance as well as other supporting documentation. **Please reference approved variance 19-01- 48.**

DEMONSTRATION THAT PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELFARE ARE PROTECTED:

1=Non-compliance with the rule will not be adverse to the public health, safety or w

Facts:

DEMONSTRATION OF UNDUE HARDSHIP OR HISTORICALLY SIGNIFICANT STRUCTURE:

Imposition of the rule would result in an undue hardship (unusual difficulty) because of physical limitations of the construction site or its utility services.

Imposition of the rule would result in an undue hardship (unusual difficulty) because of major operational problems in the use of the building or structure.

Imposition of the rule would result in an undue hardship (unusual difficulty) because of excessive costs of additional or altered construction elements.

Imposition of the rule would prevent the preservation of an architecturally or a historically significant part of the building or structure

Facts: