Owner / Applicant Information

P.K.

Patel

Indiana University

1800 NORTH RANGE ROAD

BLOOMINGTON

47408

Phone

8128557894

[email protected]

Submitter Information

Ralph

Gerdes

Ralph Gerdes Consultants, LLC

5510 S. East St.

Indianapolis

Phone

3177873750

[email protected]

Designer Information

Alan

Tucker

CSO Architects

8831 Keystone Crossing

Indianapolis

Phone

3178487800

[email protected]

Project Information

IU McNutt Dining Addition & Renovation

1101 N Fee Lane

Bloomington

47406

County

MONROE

Project Type

New

Addition

Alteration

Existing

Change of Occupancy

Project Status

F=Filed U or Null=Unfiled

IDHS Issued Correction order?

Violation Issued by:

Local Building Official

Phone:

8123492967

Email:

[email protected]

Local Fire Official

8123492967

Email:

[email protected]

Phone:

Variance Details

Code Name:

Other Code (Not in the list provided)

2014 InBC, 508.4

Conditions:

Addition Groups A-2/M occupancy will not have occupancy separation from remainder of the building (A-2, S-1, S-2, R-2,and B occupancy). Mixed occupancy building with open stairs and one (1) hour structure will not have fire ratings for separated uses. Code requires some two (2) hour separations in nonsprinklered building.

DEMONSTRATION THAT PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELFARE ARE PROTECTED:

1=Non-compliance with the rule will not be adverse to the public health, safety or w

2= Applicant will undertake alternative actions in lieu of compliance with the rule to ensure that granting of the variance will not be adverse to public health, safety, or welfare. Explain why alternative actions would be adequate (be specific).

Facts:

Ground Floor and First Floor will be sprinklered per NFPA 13.

DEMONSTRATION OF UNDUE HARDSHIP OR HISTORICALLY SIGNIFICANT STRUCTURE:

Imposition of the rule would result in an undue hardship (unusual difficulty) because of physical limitations of the construction site or its utility services.

Imposition of the rule would result in an undue hardship (unusual difficulty) because of major operational problems in the use of the building or structure.

Imposition of the rule would result in an undue hardship (unusual difficulty) because of excessive costs of additional or altered construction elements.

Imposition of the rule would prevent the preservation of an architecturally or a historically significant part of the building or structure

Facts:

Cost of providing fire barriers or sprinklering entire building is the hardship.

Variance Details

Code Name:

Other Code (Not in the list provided)

2014 InBC, 903.2.1.2

Conditions:

Two (2) story addition of approx 22,423 sq.ft. increases existing fire area,requiring entire building to be sprinklered. The partial third and fourth floor areas will not be sprinklered.

DEMONSTRATION THAT PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELFARE ARE PROTECTED:

1=Non-compliance with the rule will not be adverse to the public health, safety or w

Facts:

1. The Ground Floor and First Floor will be sprinklered per NFPA 13.

DEMONSTRATION OF UNDUE HARDSHIP OR HISTORICALLY SIGNIFICANT STRUCTURE:

Imposition of the rule would result in an undue hardship (unusual difficulty) because of physical limitations of the construction site or its utility services.

Imposition of the rule would result in an undue hardship (unusual difficulty) because of major operational problems in the use of the building or structure.

Imposition of the rule would result in an undue hardship (unusual difficulty) because of excessive costs of additional or altered construction elements.

Imposition of the rule would prevent the preservation of an architecturally or a historically significant part of the building or structure

Facts:

Cost of sprinklering upper floors, where no work is planned, is the hardship.

Variance Details

Code Name:

12-4-12 Existing Buildings; Additions or Alterations

12(f)(3)

Conditions:

Existing four (4) story dining, classroom, apartment and storage building will have an addition on the first two (2) levels of the building. Ground Floor addition will be approx 12,000 sq.ft. and First Floor will be approx 11,000 sq.ft. The additons will bring the building into noncompliance with current allowable floor area and height for a non-sprinklered building. First floor will be approx 39,000 sq.ft. with 16,625 sq.ft. permitted for Type IIA (1 hour)

DEMONSTRATION THAT PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELFARE ARE PROTECTED:

1=Non-compliance with the rule will not be adverse to the public health, safety or w

Facts:

1. First two (2) floor levels will be sprinklered per NFPA 13.
2. Addition will match existing Type IIA (1 hour) construction.

DEMONSTRATION OF UNDUE HARDSHIP OR HISTORICALLY SIGNIFICANT STRUCTURE:

Imposition of the rule would result in an undue hardship (unusual difficulty) because of physical limitations of the construction site or its utility services.

Imposition of the rule would result in an undue hardship (unusual difficulty) because of major operational problems in the use of the building or structure.

Imposition of the rule would result in an undue hardship (unusual difficulty) because of excessive costs of additional or altered construction elements.

Imposition of the rule would prevent the preservation of an architecturally or a historically significant part of the building or structure

Facts:

Cost of sprinklering entire building or upgrading existing construction is the hardship.

Variance Details

Code Name:

Other Code (Not in the list provided)

2014 InBC, Table 1018.1

Conditions:

Ground Floor will not have one (1) hour fire rated corridors. Code requires one (1) hour corridors in buildings that are not fully sprinklered.

DEMONSTRATION THAT PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELFARE ARE PROTECTED:

1=Non-compliance with the rule will not be adverse to the public health, safety or w

Facts:

1. Ground Floor and First Floor will be sprinklered per NFPA 13.
2. New exit passageway will be one (1) hour.

DEMONSTRATION OF UNDUE HARDSHIP OR HISTORICALLY SIGNIFICANT STRUCTURE:

Imposition of the rule would result in an undue hardship (unusual difficulty) because of physical limitations of the construction site or its utility services.

Imposition of the rule would result in an undue hardship (unusual difficulty) because of major operational problems in the use of the building or structure.

Imposition of the rule would result in an undue hardship (unusual difficulty) because of excessive costs of additional or altered construction elements.

Imposition of the rule would prevent the preservation of an architecturally or a historically significant part of the building or structure

Facts:

cost of providing upgraded corridor construction on floor that will be sprinklered is the hardship.