| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Variance Details |
|
|
|
|
Code Name: |
|
ASME A17.1 2007 Edition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.19.4.1, 3.19.4.4, 3.19.4.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Conditions: |
|
THIS IS NEW HYDRAULIC MRL TECHNOLOGY, WHICH HAS NOT BEEN ADOPTED BY THE STATE OF INDIANA. PLEASE REFERENCE APPROVED VARIANCE #14-05-04.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEMONSTRATION THAT PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELFARE ARE PROTECTED: |
|
|
|
|
|
1=Non-compliance with the rule will not be adverse to the public health, safety or w |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2= Applicant will undertake alternative actions in lieu of compliance with the rule to ensure that granting of the variance will not be adverse to public health, safety, or welfare. Explain why alternative actions would be adequate (be specific).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facts: |
|
SEE ATTACHED.
THIS TYPE OF ELEVATOR IS SAFE AND IS BEING USED IN OTHER BUILDINGS IN INDIANA AND ACROSS THE COUNTRY.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEMONSTRATION OF UNDUE HARDSHIP OR HISTORICALLY SIGNIFICANT STRUCTURE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Imposition of the rule would result in an undue hardship (unusual difficulty) because of physical limitations of the construction site or its utility services.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Imposition of the rule would result in an undue hardship (unusual difficulty) because of major operational problems in the use of the building or structure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y |
|
Imposition of the rule would result in an undue hardship (unusual difficulty) because of excessive costs of additional or altered construction elements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Imposition of the rule would prevent the preservation of an architecturally or a historically significant part of the building or structure
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facts: |
|
LACK OF MACHINE ROOM ALLOWS FOR MORE USABLE SPACE IN THE BUILDING. |
|
|
|