Owner / Applicant Information

Dusty

Newman

907 KELLY ST

ROME CITY

46784

Phone

2605854322

[email protected]

Project Information

Fancy Flowers and Greenhouse LLC

907 kelly St

Rome City

46784

County

NOBLE

Project Type

New

Addition

Alteration

Existing

Change of Occupancy

Project Status

F=Filed U or Null=Unfiled

IDHS Issued Correction order?

Violation Issued by:

Local Building Official

Phone:

2606362215

Email:

[email protected]

Local Fire Official

Phone:

2606362215

Email:

[email protected]

Variance Details

Code Name:

Other Code (Not in the list provided)

GAR 12-13-3

Conditions:

Need Variance to operate business from a separate pole type accessory building. Will be selling produce, plants and flowers from this location. I will have no employees and the amount of customers will be limited. This is a small building of 1600sq ft. with 3 exits.

DEMONSTRATION THAT PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELFARE ARE PROTECTED:

1=Non-compliance with the rule will not be adverse to the public health, safety or w

2= Applicant will undertake alternative actions in lieu of compliance with the rule to ensure that granting of the variance will not be adverse to public health, safety, or welfare. Explain why alternative actions would be adequate (be specific).

Facts:

This will not affect safety of public because I will not have flammable products or hazardous products. There will be no machinery being used. There are 3 exits located in this 1600 sq ft building. Also appropriate smoke alarms and fire extinguishers and exit signage.

DEMONSTRATION OF UNDUE HARDSHIP OR HISTORICALLY SIGNIFICANT STRUCTURE:

Imposition of the rule would result in an undue hardship (unusual difficulty) because of physical limitations of the construction site or its utility services.

Imposition of the rule would result in an undue hardship (unusual difficulty) because of major operational problems in the use of the building or structure.

Imposition of the rule would result in an undue hardship (unusual difficulty) because of excessive costs of additional or altered construction elements.

Imposition of the rule would prevent the preservation of an architecturally or a historically significant part of the building or structure

Facts:

The hardship is that I would have to build a new building and that would cost too much it, would put such a financial strain on my business I would have to close down, as my funds are limited. It would also put my finances in such a state that it would almost be impossible for me to overcome the financial strain as I have all my savings invested into this project with no money coming back in this would be devastating for my future. I am a very small business that is family owned.