Owner / Applicant Information | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Crannell | Joseph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Joseph L. Crannell | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5611 PROGRESS ROAD | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INDIANAPOLIS | IN | 46241 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phone | 3172474786 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[email protected] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitter Information | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jason | Holt | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Four Point Design Partners | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9229 Delegates Row | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Indianapolis | IN | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phone | 3178409968 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[email protected] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Designer Information | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GEORGE FREDRICK | SMALL | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
George Small | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4676 St John Cir | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Zionsville | IN | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phone | 3172898007 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[email protected] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Project Information | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Precision Rings | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5611 Progress Road | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INDIANAPOLIS | IN | 46241 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
County | MARION | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Project Type | New | Addition | Alteration | Y | Existing | Change of Occupancy | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Project Status | F | F=Filed U or Null=Unfiled | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
IDHS Issued Correction order? | No | yes | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Violation Issued by: | LBD | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Local Building Official | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phone: | 3173278700 | Email: | [email protected] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Local Fire Official | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3173278700 | Email: | [email protected] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phone: |
Variance Details | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Code Name: | Other Code (Not in the list provided) | |||||||||||||||||||||
ANSI A117.1 2009: 308.3.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Conditions: | The employee breakroom counter, as built in phase 1 of this project, is at 36"H instead of the required 34"H. And the counter is 25" deep which puts the electrical outlets at too far of a reach. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
DEMONSTRATION THAT PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELFARE ARE PROTECTED: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
1=Non-compliance with the rule will not be adverse to the public health, safety or w | ||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2= Applicant will undertake alternative actions in lieu of compliance with the rule to ensure that granting of the variance will not be adverse to public health, safety, or welfare. Explain why alternative actions would be adequate (be specific). |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Facts: | 1. The breakroom is separated from public space and will only be accessible by employees.
2. The breakroom counter, prior to renovation, was installed at 36"H, and existing under- counter appliances are trying to be re-used. 3. The Owner understands that if there are any complaints in the future, that it will be his responsibility to lower the counter to 34"H. and that extension rings shall be installed on outlets to meet code. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
DEMONSTRATION OF UNDUE HARDSHIP OR HISTORICALLY SIGNIFICANT STRUCTURE: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Imposition of the rule would result in an undue hardship (unusual difficulty) because of physical limitations of the construction site or its utility services. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Y | Imposition of the rule would result in an undue hardship (unusual difficulty) because of major operational problems in the use of the building or structure. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Y | Imposition of the rule would result in an undue hardship (unusual difficulty) because of excessive costs of additional or altered construction elements. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Imposition of the rule would prevent the preservation of an architecturally or a historically significant part of the building or structure |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Facts: | 1. The breakroom is part of the first phase of this project, and staff has already moved into the finished space. Re-work of the new breakroom will cause a disruption to the staff's current workflow.
2. The cost to re-work the counter height would be significant. The casework is designed in a way that lowering the counter would result in re-fabrication and installation of all new casework, and demo/re-installation of full height wall tile on back wall. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Variance Details | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Code Name: | Other Code (Not in the list provided) | |||||||||||||||||||||
IBC 2014: 1109.13 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Conditions: | The employee breakroom counter, as built in phase 1 of this project, is at 36"H instead of the required 34"H. And the counter is 25" deep which puts the electrical outlets at too far of a reach. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
DEMONSTRATION THAT PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELFARE ARE PROTECTED: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
1=Non-compliance with the rule will not be adverse to the public health, safety or w | ||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2= Applicant will undertake alternative actions in lieu of compliance with the rule to ensure that granting of the variance will not be adverse to public health, safety, or welfare. Explain why alternative actions would be adequate (be specific). |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Facts: | 1. The breakroom is separated from public space and will only be accessible by employees.
2. The breakroom counter, prior to renovation, was installed at 36"H, and existing under- counter appliances are trying to be re-used. 3. The Owner understands that if there are any complaints in the future, that it will be his responsibility to lower the counter to 34"H. and that extension rings shall be installed on outlets to meet code. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
DEMONSTRATION OF UNDUE HARDSHIP OR HISTORICALLY SIGNIFICANT STRUCTURE: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Imposition of the rule would result in an undue hardship (unusual difficulty) because of physical limitations of the construction site or its utility services. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Y | Imposition of the rule would result in an undue hardship (unusual difficulty) because of major operational problems in the use of the building or structure. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Y | Imposition of the rule would result in an undue hardship (unusual difficulty) because of excessive costs of additional or altered construction elements. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Imposition of the rule would prevent the preservation of an architecturally or a historically significant part of the building or structure |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Facts: | 1. The breakroom is part of the first phase of this project, and staff has already moved into the finished space. Re-work of the new breakroom will cause a disruption to the staff's current workflow.
2. The cost to re-work the counter height would be significant. The casework is designed in a way that lowering the counter would result in re-fabrication and installation of all new casework, and demo/re-installation of full height wall tile on back wall. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Variance Details | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Code Name: | Other Code (Not in the list provided) | |||||||||||||||||||||
ANSI A117.1 2009: 902.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Conditions: | The employee breakroom counter, as built in phase 1 of this project, is at 36"H instead of the required 34"H. And the counter is 25" deep which puts the electrical outlets at too far of a reach. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
DEMONSTRATION THAT PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELFARE ARE PROTECTED: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
1=Non-compliance with the rule will not be adverse to the public health, safety or w | ||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2= Applicant will undertake alternative actions in lieu of compliance with the rule to ensure that granting of the variance will not be adverse to public health, safety, or welfare. Explain why alternative actions would be adequate (be specific). |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Facts: | 1. The breakroom is separated from public space and will only be accessible by employees.
2. The breakroom counter, prior to renovation, was installed at 36"H, and existing under- counter appliances are trying to be re-used. 3. The Owner understands that if there are any complaints in the future, that it will be his responsibility to lower the counter to 34"H. and that extension rings shall be installed on outlets to meet code. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
1. The breakroom is separated from public space and will only be accessible by employees.
2. The breakroom counter, prior to renovation, was installed at 36"H, and existing under- counter appliances are trying to be re-used. 3. The Owner understands that if there are any complaints in the future, that it will be his responsibility to lower the counter to 34"H. and that extension rings shall be installed on outlets to meet code. |
|||||||||||
DEMONSTRATION OF UNDUE HARDSHIP OR HISTORICALLY SIGNIFICANT STRUCTURE: | |||||||||||
Imposition of the rule would result in an undue hardship (unusual difficulty) because of physical limitations of the construction site or its utility services. |
|||||||||||
Imposition of the rule would result in an undue hardship (unusual difficulty) because of major operational problems in the use of the building or structure. |
|||||||||||
Y | |||||||||||
Y | Imposition of the rule would result in an undue hardship (unusual difficulty) because of excessive costs of additional or altered construction elements. |
||||||||||
Imposition of the rule would prevent the preservation of an architecturally or a historically significant part of the building or structure |
|||||||||||
Facts: | 1. The breakroom is part of the first phase of this project, and staff has already moved into the finished space. Re-work of the new breakroom will cause a disruption to the staff's current workflow.
2. The cost to re-work the counter height would be significant. The casework is designed in a way that lowering the counter would result in re-fabrication and installation of all new casework, and demo/re-installation of full height wall tile on back wall. |
||||||||||
Variance Details | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Code Name: | Other Code (Not in the list provided) | |||||||||||||||||||||
IBC 2014: 1109.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Conditions: | The employee breakroom counter, as built in phase 1 of this project, is at 36"H instead of the required 34"H. And the counter is 25" deep which puts the electrical outlets at too far of a reach. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
DEMONSTRATION THAT PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELFARE ARE PROTECTED: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
1=Non-compliance with the rule will not be adverse to the public health, safety or w | ||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2= Applicant will undertake alternative actions in lieu of compliance with the rule to ensure that granting of the variance will not be adverse to public health, safety, or welfare. Explain why alternative actions would be adequate (be specific). |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Facts: | 1. The breakroom is separated from public space and will only be accessible by employees.
2. The breakroom counter, prior to renovation, was installed at 36"H, and existing under- counter appliances are trying to be re-used. 3. The Owner understands that if there are any complaints in the future, that it will be his responsibility to lower the counter to 34"H. and that extension rings shall be installed on outlets to meet code. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
DEMONSTRATION OF UNDUE HARDSHIP OR HISTORICALLY SIGNIFICANT STRUCTURE: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Imposition of the rule would result in an undue hardship (unusual difficulty) because of physical limitations of the construction site or its utility services. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Y | Imposition of the rule would result in an undue hardship (unusual difficulty) because of major operational problems in the use of the building or structure. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Y | Imposition of the rule would result in an undue hardship (unusual difficulty) because of excessive costs of additional or altered construction elements. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Imposition of the rule would prevent the preservation of an architecturally or a historically significant part of the building or structure |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Facts: | 1. The breakroom is part of the first phase of this project, and staff has already moved into the finished space. Re-work of the new breakroom will cause a disruption to the staff's current workflow.
2. The cost to re-work the counter height would be significant. The casework is designed in a way that lowering the counter would result in re-fabrication and installation of all new casework, and demo/re-installation of full height wall tile on back wall. |
|||||||||||||||||||||