| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Owner / Applicant Information |
|
|
|
|
|
Bonnie |
|
F |
|
Bowers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2860 E CONTRERAS PIKE |
|
|
|
|
|
WEST COLLEGE CORNER |
|
IN |
|
47003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phone |
|
8595832542 |
|
|
|
|
|
Email |
|
[email protected] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Project Information |
|
|
|
|
Black Walnut Grove Estate |
|
|
|
|
2860 E Contreras Pike |
|
|
|
|
|
West College Corn |
|
|
|
47003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
County |
|
UNION |
|
|
|
|
|
Project Type |
|
New |
|
|
|
Addition |
|
|
|
Alteration |
|
|
|
Existing |
|
Y |
|
Change of Occupancy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Project Status |
|
F |
|
F=Filed U or Null=Unfiled |
|
|
|
|
|
|
IDHS Issued Correction order? |
|
No |
|
No |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Violation Issued by: |
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Local Building Official |
|
|
|
|
Phone: |
|
7654585044 |
|
Email: |
|
[email protected] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Local Fire Official |
|
|
Phone: |
|
7654585044 |
|
Email: |
|
[email protected] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance Details |
|
|
|
|
Code Name: |
|
1990 Indiana Fire Prevention Code (675 IAC 22-2.1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
903.2.1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Conditions: |
|
The current structure, a historical barn, does not have a sprinkler system installed. |
|
|
|
|
DEMONSTRATION THAT PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELFARE ARE PROTECTED: |
|
|
|
|
|
1=Non-compliance with the rule will not be adverse to the public health, safety or w |
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
1=Non-compliance with the rule will not be adverse to the public health, safety or w |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2= Applicant will undertake alternative actions in lieu of compliance with the rule to ensure that granting of the variance will not be adverse to public health, safety, or welfare. Explain why alternative actions would be adequate (be specific).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facts: |
|
Other fire protection measures will be used to ensure the safety of guests at the barn. |
|
|
|
|
DEMONSTRATION OF UNDUE HARDSHIP OR HISTORICALLY SIGNIFICANT STRUCTURE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Imposition of the rule would result in an undue hardship (unusual difficulty) because of physical limitations of the construction site or its utility services.
|
|
|
Y |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Imposition of the rule would result in an undue hardship (unusual difficulty) because of major operational problems in the use of the building or structure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y |
|
Imposition of the rule would result in an undue hardship (unusual difficulty) because of excessive costs of additional or altered construction elements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Imposition of the rule would prevent the preservation of an architecturally or a historically significant part of the building or structure
|
|
|
Y |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facts: |
|
The barn that will be used for receptions was built in the late 1800's and remodeled in the 1960's. As the barn is in the country the only water sources include a cistern and a well which is currently used for the house. In addition, the cost of installing a sprinkler system would prohibit my ability to move forward with the project.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|